Pathfinder users: would you support a subscription model?

stu.farnham's Avatar

stu.farnham

02 Sep, 2017 04:30 PM

Anyone who has been watching the market for productivity apps, at least on the Mac, knows that is a very challenging market in which to succeed. The App Store has changed how users value software, driving prices down.This makes it difficult for companies like Cocoatech to be profitable. Its users see the effect of this in the overall decrease of responsiveness from Cocoatech. How long have we suffered with the PF7 screen focus bug? Why is there no High Sierra beta version and likely no High Sierra supported version. until PF8? My guess it is due the the financial squeeze.

I have been using Pathfinder for as long as I have been using a Mac, and hadn't given it any particular thought for several years until I switched to the High Sierra beta and had to work without it. Over time it has insinuated itself into my workflow to the point that it is indispensable. I tried a couple of its competitors (CommandOne and ForkLift) and they are feature poor by comparison.Pathfinder has become very valuable to me; Finder isn't even in the game.

Over the several years several long time essential apps have gravitated towards subscription models, largely to attempt to offset the market forces that are squeezing so many out of business. 1Password and TextExpander are two that come to mind. Microsoft and Adobe have also made the transition.

A couple of these transitions provide object lessons in how NOT to make the switch. Adobe faced tremendous backlash in the photography market until they created the $10/month photography bundle. TextExpander users felt they were being forced into a price increasin with a new version that did not add value for the; in fact many felt the removal of Dropbox sync removed value. Fortunately for its users the folks at Smile software listened to their customers and made adjustments.

Microsoft (a company I am generally slow to praise) did a great job with their subscription model for Office 365. Although there are only two of us in my household we have thee Macs and at usually a couple of Windows VMs for work purposes, plus a couple of iPhones and iPads. We can run office on all of these for $100/year. New fealties in 1Password were such that switching to the subscription version was a no brainer in a household with lots of computers, multiple operating systems, and shared passwords for a number of accounts.

There's a key lesson in the approaches and experiences of those companies who have made the switch. The successful changeovers occurred when users perceived added value as well as added cost. When they did not companies like Adobe and Smile software were compelled to make adjustments to create sufficient user value.

So, what's my point? I would like to see Cocoatech move to a subscription model if doing so will help them remain profitable and to maintain and extend their product in the manner they have traditionally done.I'd gladly pay something like the upgrade price of $20/year for the software, especially if there was some sort of multi license bundle available.

A question for all of you who follow this forum: would you support a switch to a subscription model? What would motivate you to do so or why would you not?

Stu

Showing page 3 out of 3. View the first page

  1. Path Finder Support Team closed this discussion on 10 Oct, 2018 08:32 AM.

  2. Path Finder Support Team re-opened this discussion on 10 Oct, 2018 08:32 AM

  3. 61 Posted by thebookbloke on 19 Nov, 2018 01:47 AM

    thebookbloke's Avatar

    No I would not. The trouble I, and many others, went through to elicit even an inadequate response from Cocoatech when PF7 stopped working with High Sierra almost put me off PF for life. We thought that Cocoatech had gone out of business because we couldn't get any response fo ages.
    Eventually, we did find out that PF8 was underway and now it's out and I've paid for the latest version.
    Verdict: Not a patch on PF7. Simple things have become fiddly; full of minor irritations. I thought I had found an alternative with TotalFinder but now that is buggered under Mojave as SIP has to be turned off permanently.
    So, given the quality of Cocoatech customer service over the past year or two, I won't pay a subscription unless things improve dramatically.

  4. Path Finder Support Team closed this discussion on 19 Nov, 2018 09:22 AM.

  5. Path Finder Support Team re-opened this discussion on 19 Nov, 2018 09:23 AM

  6. 62 Posted by a14th on 21 Nov, 2018 02:37 PM

    a14th's Avatar

    No. Flat out, no subscription model. I know that's what the market is pushing everyone towards, but I will find alternatives before adopting a subscription model.

    This is not antipathy to Cocoatech; this is how I regard all software. I had to abandon Adobe Lightroom when they issued the last update to the standalone and basically forced everyone to go to the cloud.

  7. 63 Posted by Andreas on 22 Nov, 2018 12:30 PM

    Andreas's Avatar

    No way.
    I discontinue all apps trying to switch to subscription model.
    You‘d lose a PathFinder user for sure.
    Regards, Andreas

  8. 64 Posted by jb on 22 Nov, 2018 05:47 PM

    jb's Avatar

    No. Subscriptions are the death of software diversity, and only serve to kill boutique software to the benefit of large corporate monopolies. Think of how may programs the average power user purchases and employs, vs. how many $10-20/month substriptions that same person would be willing or even able to support.

    I would completely support almost any increase in software purchase price, as well as additional fees for every upgrade. I should be able to decide whether the cost is worth what I'm getting in advance. But an automatic deduction from my checking account with no real guarantee of development or usefulness, in fact just the feeling of pressure that I'm paying for some program even if I'm not currently using it, well, that's not something I will ever support. Every program that goes to subscription immediately also goes to my trash can. I fully support software development, but subscriptions are the death of choice. There's always a ton of free Unix utilities that can do much of the same job faster anyway.

  9. Path Finder Support Team closed this discussion on 22 Nov, 2018 11:25 PM.

  10. Path Finder Support Team re-opened this discussion on 22 Nov, 2018 11:26 PM

  11. 65 Posted by Jesper on 30 Dec, 2018 03:04 AM

    Jesper's Avatar

    No.
    I'm happy to pay for upgrades. I will never pay for a subscription model of software that is local to my computer and do not provide any external service. I actually do pay for a subscription of one single application, and I think it is worth it because I use their servers on a daily basis. But that's the only one so far, and I'm actively looking for a pay-once alternative to that software.

  12. Path Finder Support Team closed this discussion on 31 Dec, 2018 10:02 AM.

  13. Path Finder Support Team re-opened this discussion on 31 Dec, 2018 10:03 AM

  14. 66 Posted by painter on 02 Jan, 2019 06:46 PM

    painter's Avatar

    Would a subscription version come with a Pathfinder that actually works? If yes, then I would. I have an ordinary computer and am an ordinary user. I don't have time to deal with flaky apps and naively believe that they should work as advertised.
    I like the concept of Pathfinder, but just like with the previous versions of Pathfinder, #8 crashes and freezes my computer. After looking at the convoluted tech-heavy solutions in the forums, I have the same solution as with previous versions that I tried, including the ones I paid for - uninstall and revert to dumb-but-works Finder.

  15. 67 Posted by a14th on 03 Jan, 2019 04:03 PM

    a14th's Avatar

    Is this actually a thing?

    Subscription models work for applications that have a large set of features; namely, MS Office 365, Adobe Photoshop/LightRoom, and so on. These applications can be expected to roll out new features every so often, and have these features available via the web. The features need to be tested carefully and throughly before release to the public, in the hopes they don't interfere with something else.

    I don't see PathFinder as fitting this group. PF, to me anyway, is a tool box with hammers, screwdrivers, wrenches, and the occasional drill bits necessary to navigate Mac OS. How much continuing development is necessary? How many new features need to be added?

    In the case of MacOS, there is a real need to keep up with OS development. Each iteration seems to bring a host of break/fixes due to Apple changing something in the APIs or elsewhere in the core of the OS. This is frustrating, believe me, but it does not bring the need to introduce new features. My PF gets me around folders nicely, summons applications where I need, browses external drives, copies and moves files, has an excellent group-rename feature, and supports the addition of filetype handlers.

    I don't really need any more than that, and would not welcome any continuing feature-creep that would end up causing PF to become bloated.

    Wayyyyyy back in the DOS world there was an excellent program called LIST. It was a super-slim and fast file browser that did exactly what it needed to do without adding complicated features. I was hoping PF would observe this design philosophy. (RIP Vernon Buerg)

    So to answer the question directly, no. I will stick with PF7 as long as I can.

  16. 68 Posted by startingtolookf... on 03 Jan, 2019 08:12 PM

    startingtolookforalternatives's Avatar

    You're kidding, right?

  17. 69 Posted by Alan Rogers on 03 Jan, 2019 09:03 PM

    Alan Rogers's Avatar

    No, I wouldn't support a subscription model. I currently run an earlier version of Photoshop on a Mac with an earlier OS (long may it last) to avoid Adobe's subscription model. One good thing has come of it though, that Affinity has stepped into the ring with pay once products that meet and exceed Adobe's product features. Perhaps that's the future of software development—that bloatware prices itself out of the market, leaving the opportunity for feature rich, well written, fast software to take its place. I just hope PF stays in the feature rich, well written, fast software category. I don't need new features, I just need it to work how it's always worked despite Apple's 'advancements'. (In fact, perhaps there's a need for another lean OS that has the features that lured me from CP/M to OS7!)

  18. Path Finder Support Team closed this discussion on 04 Jan, 2019 10:59 AM.

  19. Path Finder Support Team re-opened this discussion on 04 Jan, 2019 10:59 AM

Reply to this discussion

Internal reply

Formatting help / Preview (switch to plain text) No formatting (switch to Markdown)

Attaching KB article:

»

Attached Files

You can attach files up to 10MB

If you don't have an account yet, we need to confirm you're human and not a machine trying to post spam.

Keyboard shortcuts

Generic

? Show this help
ESC Blurs the current field

Comment Form

r Focus the comment reply box
^ + ↩ Submit the comment

You can use Command ⌘ instead of Control ^ on Mac